horizontal rule

閸忚櫕鏁為崗顑跨船閸欏嚖绱濋梼鍛邦嚢閸忋劑鍎撮悳鎷岊攽濞夋洖绶ラ妴浣筋攽閺€鎸庣《鐟欏嫮鐡戦敍灞肩啊鐟欙絾娓堕弬鐗堢《瀵板绁拋顖ょ礉鏉╂ɑ婀侀弴鏉戭樋

欢迎访问本站。

Previous Psychology

The behaviorist asks: Why don't we make what we can observe the real field of psychology? Let us limit ourselves to things that can be observed, and formulate laws concerning only those things. Now what can we observe? We can observe behavior - what the organism does or says. And let us point out at once: that saying is doing - that is, behaving. . . - John Watson, behaviorist

Strangely, the study of the mind has come into the peculiar position of being a study that denies the mind! That's like biology denying the existence of biological organisms, but going on pretending to still be the science of biological organisms while actually dealing with something else entirely. A subject can't exist if it denies the very basis of its own existence by definition. That is the state of modern western psychology and psychiatry. Mmmm? They can't and shouldn't exist, but they do. The entire structure of these subjects as they currently exist is a sham.

Let's take a closer look at this. We each are quite aware we have a mind, emotions, and thoughts, even if we are not so clear or sure about the "soul" and "spirit". We know we are aware and possess self-awareness, but what the nature, qualities and potentials are of awareness is largely anybody's guess. We each know we possess consciousness. In fact, we are aware of our own consciousness as much or more than anything else, yet modern "science" ignores and even denies it. But the truth, despite what "science" or "professionals" say, is that the mind exists to and for each of us as an obvious and observable fact of direct experience. A quick look can tell us many obvious things.

Next

感谢您访问本站。

閸﹀搫婀撮幒銊ョ畭 閾忔矮缍呮禒銉ョ窡 鐢ǹ鍕惧▔鏇炵伐妞ら箖妫堕敍姘秿濮濄垺妲告导浣风瑹閻ㄥ嫪绻氶崑銉ュ鞍閻拷